Gabler’s main argument is going against Boorstin regarding
celebrities. Gabler believes not all celebrities are already known.
“Celebrities are known for being well-known. They are known for living out
real-life melodramas”(207). Gabler describes celebs “as a form of narrative
art” (207). He says this because celebrities can be constructed just like
narratives are. Later in his reading he talks about the fictional creations of
the characters and how spectators view them in this way. The audience find ways
to connect with the characters that they are aware of are not really like that.
Viewers do not have to suspend their disbelief because there is no disbelief to
suspend. All of this is necessary for fiction to be successful. Celebrities
have costumes all of the time which goes to show they are not always
themselves. The public almost makes them into celebs because of their
expectations. Fiction has suspense therefore you can never know what to expect
from them. Viewers also relate to celebs as well because of “voyeurism”(208).
This is the gaining of sexual pleasure just from seeing another person
(celebrity). This is how “celebrities are unavoidably contrasted with the
fictional narratives in which most celebrities find themselves”(208). He later
talks about how celebrities live out real life melodrama as some, and sometimes
that often ends with death such as some of the celebs Gabler mentioned in his
reading. In the end, you realize celebs are real people just like us; they just
have to put on an act at times.
No comments:
Post a Comment